'

What's this about her campaign manager going on social media to say Bernie was cheating her or taking superdelegates?


Freeway said:

NO ONE CARES!!!!

 oh oh 


users of the word Shrillary should be banned forever.


springgreen2 said:

Losing?

No, my last name isn't Sanders and I'm not running for president.


Freeway said:

NO ONE CARES!!!!

Even I agree with this.


And should quit claiming that their postings are pro-Bernie rather than anti-Hillary.

Sometimes I wonder if the OP is a secret Trump supporter, since she flings words/insults like one, and seems dedicated to damaging a potential Democratic nominee.

drummerboy said:

users of the word Shrillary should be banned forever.

susan1014 said:

And should quit claiming that their postings are pro-Bernie rather than anti-Hillary.

Sometimes I wonder if the OP is a secret Trump supporter, since she flings words/insults like one, and seems dedicated to damaging a potential Democratic nominee.
drummerboy said:

users of the word Shrillary should be banned forever.

Yup!


springgreen, this should be the end of "Shillary." They'll never get out of this one.


Aw, Man...we knew they murdered Vince Foster, but JFK, Jr? Dang, they're good. Leave it to a Trumpster who threatened to release RNCers who don't support Trump, to reveal this dark truth.

_________________________________________________

Donald Trump supporter Roger Stone — who also happens to be a close friend and former business partner of Trump’s newly elevated campaign adviser, Paul Manafort — is preparing to publish a book alleging that the Clintons murdered John F. Kennedy, Jr. after learning that he was considering a run at the same New York senate seat Hillary sought.

Stone’s fascination with who really murdered a Kennedy is of long standing, as he previously wrote “The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ.” His hatred of the Clintons is of similar standing, as evidenced by his 2015 magnum opus “The Clintons’ War on Women.” But it was not until recently that he revealed he was combining these passions into a singularity of aggrieved conspiracy.

“I have a book coming up,” he told fellow conspiracy theorist James Fetzer, “in which I make the case that John F. Kennedy Jr. was murdered — and he was murdered by the Clintons, because he was in the way. Now, I have extraordinary new evidence that nobody else has seen.” Which, of course, he didn’t produce.

salon.com


GL2 said:

springgreen, this should be the end of "Shillary." They'll never get out of this one.




Aw, Man...we knew they murdered Vince Foster, but JFK, Jr? Dang, they're good. Leave it to a Trumpster who threatened to release RNCers who don't support Trump, to reveal this dark truth.

_________________________________________________

Donald Trump supporter Roger Stone — who also happens to be a close friend and former business partner of Trump’s newly elevated campaign adviser, Paul Manafort — is preparing to publish a book alleging that the Clintons murdered John F. Kennedy, Jr. after learning that he was considering a run at the same New York senate seat Hillary sought.

Stone’s fascination with who really murdered a Kennedy is of long standing, as he previously wrote “The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ.” His hatred of the Clintons is of similar standing, as evidenced by his 2015 magnum opus “The Clintons’ War on Women.” But it was not until recently that he revealed he was combining these passions into a singularity of aggrieved conspiracy.

“I have a book coming up,” he told fellow conspiracy theorist James Fetzer, “in which I make the case that John F. Kennedy Jr. was murdered — and he was murdered by the Clintons, because he was in the way. Now, I have extraordinary new evidence that nobody else has seen.” Which, of course, he didn’t produce.

salon.com

So the Clintons were not only brutal enough to kill JFK, Jr., but also his wife and sister-in-law? And possibly people on the ground had the plane been over land?


There's no limit to their ambition.


I would care if Shrillary wins


librarylady said:
susan1014 said:

And should quit claiming that their postings are pro-Bernie rather than anti-Hillary.

Sometimes I wonder if the OP is a secret Trump supporter, since she flings words/insults like one, and seems dedicated to damaging a potential Democratic nominee.
drummerboy said:

users of the word Shrillary should be banned forever.

Yup!

Agree


Hi, All. She's shrill. She has no original ideas. She's like Trump in that she sticks her finger in the air to see which way the wind blows, she has contributed nothing particular. As one ad I saw said, "there is a moderate Republican running but she calls herself a Democrat."  This is all true.


She probably will win, but it doesn't mean she is the best candidate.


springgreen2 said:

Hi, All. She's shrill.

Ironic comment   


Woot said:
librarylady said:
susan1014 said:

And should quit claiming that their postings are pro-Bernie rather than anti-Hillary.

Sometimes I wonder if the OP is a secret Trump supporter, since she flings words/insults like one, and seems dedicated to damaging a potential Democratic nominee.
drummerboy said:

users of the word Shrillary should be banned forever.

Yup!

Agree

Word!


Do we actually know that springgreen2 is a woman?

There should be a special place in hell for women who denigrate women leaders with masochistic insults.


bluepool said:

Do we actually know that springgreen2 is a woman?

Yes, she is.  

bluepool said:

There should be a special place in hell for women who denigrate women leaders with masochistic insults.

Absolutely.


springgreen2 said:

Hi, All. She's shrill. She has no original ideas. She's like Trump in that she sticks her finger in the air to see which way the wind blows, she has contributed nothing particular. As one ad I saw said, "there is a moderate Republican running but she calls herself a Democrat."  This is all true.

She is nothing like Trump since she is bought and paid for


lord_pabulum said:
springgreen2 said:

Hi, All. She's shrill. She has no original ideas. She's like Trump in that she sticks her finger in the air to see which way the wind blows, she has contributed nothing particular. As one ad I saw said, "there is a moderate Republican running but she calls herself a Democrat."  This is all true.

She is nothing like Trump since she is bought and paid for

True.


In an interview with Steve Kornacki just now, Benenson finally admitted that Hillary's advantage at this point is 220 delegates. This is a surmountable lead. 


phenixrising said:

.


Looks just like Hillary!

Even if Hillary wins New York, Bernie could still catch up. 220 delegate difference is not insurmountable. 


springgreen2 said:

Hi, All. She's shrill. She has no original ideas.

Have you looked in the mirror or read your own posts?  And I'm saying this as a Bernie supporter.


jeffhandy said:
springgreen2 said:

Hi, All. She's shrill. She has no original ideas.

Have you looked in the mirror or read your own posts?  And I'm saying this as a Bernie supporter.

Thank you !


If you think Trump comes with no strings attached, think again.

springgreen2 said:
lord_pabulum said:
springgreen2 said:

Hi, All. She's shrill. She has no original ideas. She's like Trump in that she sticks her finger in the air to see which way the wind blows, she has contributed nothing particular. As one ad I saw said, "there is a moderate Republican running but she calls herself a Democrat."  This is all true.

She is nothing like Trump since she is bought and paid for

True.

springgreen2 said:

Even if Hillary wins New York, Bernie could still catch up. 220 delegate difference is not insurmountable. 
Why Sanders Needed to Win New York


In order to add a comment – you must Join this community – Click here to do so.

Sponsored Business

Find Business